I was wondering, Im reading the rick shelley DMC/Officer series and on each book it says that he was a national best seller. The books are not to bad, but I ask this in relation to Starfist books. Side by side, Starfist is head and shoulder above the writing of Rick Shelley, no disrspect intended, just a comparison.
Yet his are listed as National Bestsellers, which leads me to believe to achieve this its more simply volume of sales versus quality of the writing.True? false? what factors come into play that havent allowed Starfist to be national best sellers?
1. Exposure?
2. Publisher?
3. Content?
Im just really curious about this, I tried to look up sales numbers for books, but most the info I got summarized that only the publishers have that info and they dont give it out to the public, so dead end there.
If you are better writer(s) (by reviews, opinion, example) than another would you decide to collaberate with another to get into that bestseller pipeline to get more exposure?
Take Heinleins Starship Troopers, not exactly a national best seller out the gates, but the author and the book had a hook, Controversy, which propelled it to greater heights. In turn became a conerstone of exposing folks to the Military Sci-Fi Genre, classic as they say. After reading more on ST, it was advanced along in popularity more by WOM than anything.
Im not trying to compare Starfist to any other really, just understand why it hasnt breached the same level, and what is possible to help that effort.
FairDay,
Trang