Search  
Thursday, December 04, 2008 ..:: Discussions ::.. Register  Login
A place for discussions about the writings of David Sherman and Dan Cragg, including fiction and non-fiction, as well as non-Starfist areas of interest.  Participating in these forums requires registration.
 Starfirst Forum Minimize
SPOILER ALERT! Please keep in mind when reading these forums that posters are likely to
reveal information about the plots or outcome of books you haven't yet read.
SearchForum Home
  Starfist: Main  General Starfist Forum  FIST Artillery...
 FIST Artillery
 
Gunny Sarge
34 posts
Joined
3/29/2007

FIST Artillery
Posted: 01 Apr 07 10:30 AM Modified By Gunny Sarge  on 4/1/2007 10:31:27 AM)
One thing i cant understand is the number of marine artillery units. For instance, in the last book, the marine artillery did little damage to General Lyon's amphibious assault. Wouldn't it make more sense to have more artillery pieces. I mean, the army had to help the marines. insufficient artillery numbers also occurred in  Steel Gauntlet. the artillery of a couple Fists put together was only like twelve, right? plus, some of them were severely damaged by the rockets on the Panzers. I would think that coupled with the loss of many Raptors, the infantry would have had little to no support by from heavy guns. I think the FISTs need a lorger artillery unit to efficiently back them up on the different campaigns on which they don't know what to expect.
Teufel Panzer MK4
1037 posts
3rd
Joined
7/1/2006

Re: FIST Artillery
Posted: 01 Apr 07 2:05 PM

The promblem seems to lie that when you have so many good troops in an area, it's a lot easier to get those good troops killed. Let's say that you drop'd ten thousand Marines on Ravenette... They'd be slaughter'd because of the troop concentration. Yes, they could use more organic artillery, but it seems that they would be destroyed faster if there were more of them. The more targets you have, the easier it is to retaliate. Hence why gurrila actions are such a pain. Easier to hide when there are so few targets.

But that is all speculation.

Gunny Sarge
34 posts
Joined
3/29/2007

Re: FIST Artillery
Posted: 01 Apr 07 3:17 PM
But in the case of Ravenette, both sides are both dug in. One would think that more artillery would help one side. You could kill off targets so that the enemy has a tougher time to retaliate. In the case with General Lyons, he certainly has a ton of men. The marines could utilize more artillery pieces by constatnly killing the enemy. Plus, all of the Coalition's forces are fighting on the Bataan, an area that is very small and therefore increases the amount of targets in the given space.
Plus, in the event that an attack does come, more artillery would mean the attacking forces get killed off faster. If there had been more artillery by the amphibious assault,  the assault would have suffered considerable causulties. Although there were so many targets and not enough things to destroy them, it would at least helped the 34th on the beach.
You say that it is hard to fight guerillas w/ artillery. Even though that many of the 34th's deployments involve guerillas, their are still campaigns like Diamunde and Ravenette that could use more artillery.

But, like you said, it is all speculation.
Teufel Panzer MK4
1037 posts
3rd
Joined
7/1/2006

Re: FIST Artillery
Posted: 01 Apr 07 10:08 PM

The problem with that situation, and Dan stop me if I am wrong, is that with so many men under his command, he could afford to send his men out in droves, and when the artillery stars falling, Lyons could direct fire against the artillery and wipe it out if it was using continious fire. Then once the artillery is destroyed, he could then afford to sit back and pound the Marines and other Confederation forces into dust, and once that has happened, he sends in the rest of his men to finish the job... Say what you will, but not even the Marines could stand up without thier artillery in such a situation as that.

Unless a new beachhead was established elsewhere, and the bulk of the forces removed to that area, the Marines could quite easilly fall.

Also, there is a chance that an amphibious landing could be launched on the rear of the island with naval forces used to harry and disrupt the target areas, and catch the confederate forces in a vice. I'd also try for some paratroopers, too. Drop them in from high atmo in a three stage vehichle... where the first two stages could be used to absorb fire from air and anti-air elements of the invasion force, and the third stage used something akin to the essay's flight pattern and take positions with heavy/assault weapons.

(shakes head) But that's assuming that the men they send in have training akin to the Marines. Maybe... a former Marine trained them, or some sort of defector. . . .

 

DEUS EX MACHINA!!!

Finucane
1932 posts
2nd
Joined
1/25/2006

Re: FIST Artillery
Posted: 02 Apr 07 3:11 AM
Think of the Pusan Perimeter, you hunker down and grit your teeth until irresistable pressure is brought against the enemy's soft point and only then do you mount a breakout.
  Starfist: Main  General Starfist Forum  FIST Artillery...

Forum Home  Search         

Copyright 2006 by Mike Clark   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement