Search  
Sunday, October 12, 2008 ..:: Discussions ::.. Register  Login
A place for discussions about the writings of David Sherman and Dan Cragg, including fiction and non-fiction, as well as non-Starfist areas of interest.  Participating in these forums requires registration.
 Starfirst Forum Minimize
SPOILER ALERT! Please keep in mind when reading these forums that posters are likely to
reveal information about the plots or outcome of books you haven't yet read.
SearchForum Home
  Starfist: Main  Starfist 12: Firestorm  Kerr in Firesto...
 Re: Kerr in Firestorm
 
Soldris
1508 posts
2nd
Joined
4/13/2007

Re: Kerr in Firestorm
Posted: 06 Jul 07 10:22 AM

They are! Very well-read gents themselves.

mclark
178 posts
5th
Joined
1/27/2006

Re: Kerr in Firestorm
Posted: 06 Jul 07 2:01 PM Modified By mclark  on 7/6/2007 2:03:30 PM)
 eric_bean34 wrote
I totally agree...but it is more likely that the authors in their extreme busy lives of writing so many fantastic stories and weaving so many characters together that they made an innocent mistake because in the end after writing over a million plus words they are still just human.


Well, it would be one thing if the "mistake" were made in the narrative itself, and not in a character's dialogue.  That would be an author's mistake.  However, when a character misstates a fact -- well, it might be an author's mistake, but it might equally be the character's mistake, made because the author made him do it.  And that is what Dan is claiming.  I, for one, will trust him on this.

An interesting use of this as a technique for an entire novel can be found in David Sherman's There I Was: The War of Corporal Henry J Morris, USMC.  The novel is long out of print, but can be found in used condition in various places on the web.

 There I Was: the War of Corporal Henry J Morris, USMC (ISBN 0-8041-0498-0) is a Vietnam War novel by David Sherman published in 1989 by the Ivy Book imprint of Ballantine Books.

The entire novel is written from two alternating points of view: as described by the title character in telling the tale to his son; and as it happened in fact. The author's apparent intent is to show how a participant's rendering of the occurrences very frequently diverges from the events themselves as they actually happened. For example, apparently in order to deflect his own personal bravery onto a fallen comrade, Morris tells his son how a comrade of his single-handedly broke an ambush his platoon had come under and received a posthumous medal for the act, but the reader learns that in the actual events Morris himself is the one who broke the ambush and received the medal, whereas his comrade had been killed early in the engagement.


DavidS
988 posts
www.novelier.com
4th
Joined
1/23/2006

Re: Kerr in Firestorm
Posted: 06 Jul 07 4:34 PM
Mike, did you notice that the farther Henry J got into his story, the more it differed from what actually happened?
Soldris
1508 posts
2nd
Joined
4/13/2007

Re: Kerr in Firestorm
Posted: 06 Jul 07 7:16 PM
I will begin looking to the book immediatly!
eric_bean34
2313 posts
www.myspace.com/mcbaencreations
1st
Joined
7/22/2006

Re: Kerr in Firestorm
Posted: 07 Jul 07 4:11 AM
Wow...i had no clue...I will never be on the same playing field as you two are as a writer...I am so honored to know you guys
  Starfist: Main  Starfist 12: Firestorm  Kerr in Firesto...

Forum Home  Search         

Copyright 2006 by Mike Clark   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement